critique

Bosses Are Becoming Obsessed With AI, Using It to Make Every Decision, Barraging Their Employees With Nonsensical ChatGPT Directives, and Even Asking It Who to Fire

An increasing number of bosses are excessively relying on AI tools like ChatGPT to make every business decision, impose unrealistic directives, and even determine employee hirings or firings, creating toxic and unproductive workplaces. Employees report constant shifts in responsibilities and strategies based solely on AI interactions, diminished human input, and a disconnect from workplace realities, often leading to frustration, reduced morale, and resignations. This trend highlights the challenges organizations face in integrating AI without undermining human judgment and effective workforce management.

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/bosses-obsessed-with-ai

How AI Has Created a Braggy Culture of Layoffs

Tech CEOs increasingly boast about AI-driven layoffs as a strategy to signal to investors their commitment to cutting costs and boosting share prices, even at the expense of employee morale. This shift toward a more aggressive, performative language around workforce reductions reflects a power imbalance where executives prioritize market performance over employee wellbeing, contributing to a culture that normalizes and even celebrates job cuts enabled by automation.

https://newrepublic.com/article/211359/ceos-artificial-intelligence-tech-layoffs

Gen Z’s AI Backlash Is Getting Louder

During the 2026 graduation season, Gen Z’s backlash against AI has become increasingly vocal, with students booing speakers who praise AI technology due to fears of job displacement and economic uncertainty. Surveys show a decline in excitement and a rise in anger toward AI among young people, who face a worsening job market partly attributed to AI-driven layoffs, highlighting a growing generational divide on the technology’s impact.

https://www.businessinsider.com/gen-z-graduates-ai-backlash-commencement-speeches-anxiety-job-market-2026-5

A Meta Employee Gets Real About the Horror of Working There Right Now

A longtime Meta employee describes the intense stress and anxiety faced amid impending layoffs of 8,000 workers, roughly 10% of Meta’s global workforce, driven by rapid AI developments. Despite being asked to train AI tools that may replace them, employees experience a lack of empathy from leadership, pervasive surveillance like key-logging, and widespread mental health struggles, reflecting a significant shift in the tech workplace environment compared to a decade ago.

https://sfstandard.com/pacific-standard-time/2026/05/15/meta-employee-gets-real-horror-working-right-now/

The “Bug-Free” Workforce: How AI Efficiency Is Subtly Disrupting The Interactions That Build Strong Teams

AI tools are streamlining workflows by eliminating the need to “bug” colleagues for help, which increases individual efficiency but also reduces informal interactions essential for building team trust, belonging, and innovation. Research shows that these micro-moments of human connection foster psychological safety and team success, and their decline due to AI automation risks lowering employee engagement, increasing attrition, and hindering innovation. To balance AI benefits with team cohesion, leaders should use AI to remove repetitive tasks while intentionally fostering human interactions that maintain psychological safety and creative collaboration.

https://smashingmagazine.com/2026/04/bug-free-workforce-ai-disrupting-teams/

America’s HR Leaders Say We’re Thinking About AI Agents All Wrong

Human resources leaders at major U.S. companies, including IBM and Microsoft, argue that AI agents should not be treated like human employees with names, job titles, or individual performance metrics, as this mindset undermines the technology’s full potential. They emphasize focusing on integrating AI into enterprise workflows for large-scale process improvement rather than managing AI as standalone “digital workers,” highlighting that accountability for AI-driven decisions must remain with humans.

https://www.wsj.com/cio-journal/americas-hr-leaders-say-were-thinking-about-ai-agents-all-wrong-7d8f1439

EnshittifAIcation

In “EnshittifAIcation,” Stefano Marinelli describes his frustration with AI-driven customer support and automated systems that fail to understand or properly address technical issues, leading to wasted time and confusion. He highlights increasing botnet attacks on e-commerce servers, challenges with geo-blocking, and the misplaced confidence in AI recommendations that disregard expert human judgment, warning of the risks in over-relying on AI without human oversight.

https://it-notes.dragas.net/2026/03/20/enshittifaication/

Tech Companies Are Blaming Massive Layoffs on AI. What’s Really Going On?

Recent tech industry layoffs attributed to artificial intelligence (AI) reflect a more complex reality than the companies suggest. While AI is beginning to impact certain jobs like programming and customer service, overall displacement remains limited, and many layoffs are influenced by factors such as corporate restructuring and investor pressures rather than AI-driven efficiency alone.

https://theconversation.com/tech-companies-are-blaming-massive-layoffs-on-ai-whats-really-going-on-278314

Push to Replace Workers With AI Faces Backlash — Even From Management

Survey shows employees, including managers, prefer human collaboration over AI, citing limitations in AI’s creativity and judgment. Many believe replacing workers with AI leads to legal risk and disrupts talent pipelines. Despite claims of AI-driven job displacement, experts suggest a cautious approach emphasizing human roles alongside AI innovations.

https://www.cio.com/article/4138743/push-to-replace-workers-with-ai-faces-backlash-even-from-management.html

Staff Journalists Sacked and Misleadingly Replaced With AI Writers

AI writers replace fired human journalists at gaming sites, sparking outrage. Clickout Media, now owning The Escapist, Videogamer, and Esports Insider, has replaced staff with misleading AI-generated content, including fake profiles. Metacritic removed an AI-generated game review amid concerns over quality and authenticity. This trend highlights a widening issue in media where AI is favored for cost efficiency, causing distress in the gaming journalism community.

https://pressgazette.co.uk/news/staff-journalists-sacked-and-misleadingly-replaced-with-ai-writers/

Block & Tackle: Job Cuts & the AI Narrative

Jack Dorsey, CEO of Block, announced layoffs of 4,200 employees, over 40% of the workforce, while framing it as an AI-driven transition. However, this contrasts with the company’s operational inefficiencies and over-hiring, particularly during COVID. Wall Street reacted positively to the layoffs, ignoring deeper management issues that AI cannot resolve. The memo’s narrative suggests that AI is transforming work, yet it masks problems stemming from past decisions and poor management practices. Block’s inefficiency, highlighted by lower per-employee operating income compared to peers, emphasizes that AI won’t fix fundamental issues. These layoffs reflect a broader trend in Silicon Valley where companies blame technology for management failures.

https://om.co/2026/02/28/block-tackle-job-cuts-the-ai-narrative/

Is Block’s Decision To Layoff 40% of Its Workforce a Bellwether Or Not?

Block Inc. plans to lay off 40% of its workforce (4,000 employees) and replace them with AI. CEO Jack Dorsey’s announcement lacks specifics. While AI is often perceived as a tool for eliminating jobs, it’s more about enhancing operational efficiency. Past studies indicate that job loss due to AI is less significant than anticipated, as it generally improves productivity without massive layoffs. Effective AI implementation requires re-engineering processes rather than simply cutting jobs. Companies must invest in infrastructure and staff for AI deployment, which can be costly. Therefore, AI’s real benefits lie in process transformation rather than outright job displacement.

https://joshbersin.com/2026/03/is-blocks-decision-to-layoff-40-of-its-workforce-a-bellwether-or-not/

Can Advanced AI Lead to Negative Economic Growth?

The essay explores the potential for negative economic growth due to advanced AI automation. It argues that if automation displaces most workers and reduces their income, thereby decreasing demand for goods and services, the economy could shrink despite increased production capacity. The author examines two scenarios: one in which satiated preferences and income redistribution from workers to capital owners lead to a demand collapse, and another in which automation reduces savings and the capital stock, affecting future generations.

https://aleximas.substack.com/p/will-advanced-ai-lead-to-negative

Scroll to Top