work

AI Was Supposed to Destroy Jobs. Where’s the Carnage?

, ,

Despite early predictions that AI would cause widespread job losses, economists and recent data show that mass displacement has not yet occurred; instead, AI is transforming the nature of work by increasing productivity and shifting skill requirements. Employers are raising expectations for AI skills, leading to job consolidation and changing hiring patterns, with a growing emphasis on freelance and contract roles as companies adjust. While some workers may face more precarious employment, experts note that the full economic and labor market impacts of AI will unfold over many years.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/12/ai-job-destruction

Tech Leaders Say AI Means Less Work – Their Staff Say They Work up to 90 Hours a Week

, , ,

Tech company leaders have predicted that AI will reduce working hours and enable shorter workweeks, but employees at AI-focused firms report much longer hours, sometimes up to 90 hours weekly during intense project periods called “sprints.” Research shows AI use has led workers to take on more tasks, work faster, and extend hours, with time savings often absorbed by new responsibilities such as monitoring AI output, contributing to a culture of increased workload rather than reduced labor.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgx4yd1gl2o

What Workers Are Saying About AI

,

A recent Ipsos survey reveals that while many American workers view AI as destructive to jobs and expect it to worsen the overall work experience, only a small percentage believe AI will replace their own jobs. Workers using AI tend to have more positive views about its impact in their fields, yet there remains widespread skepticism that the primary beneficiaries of AI will be business owners and executives rather than workers themselves.

https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/what-workers-are-saying-about-ai

AI Is Changing Work. Preparing Workers Must Be a Shared Priority.

, ,

The Information Technology Industry Council emphasizes that artificial intelligence is transforming work by altering tasks rather than eliminating whole jobs, creating opportunities for productivity and innovation while also causing disruptions. They advocate for coordinated efforts among companies, governments, and educational institutions to invest in AI literacy, continuous workforce training, and skills development to prepare workers for these changes. ITI supports legislative measures that promote AI education and workforce reskilling to ensure Americans can adapt and thrive in the evolving AI-driven labor landscape.

https://www.itic.org/news-events/techwonk-blog/ai-is-changing-work-preparing-workers-must-be-a-shared-priority

Why Is Everyone In Tech So Sad?

, , , ,

The article explores the growing sense of disillusionment among knowledge workers in the tech industry as AI increasingly automates their tasks, challenging the meaningfulness of their careers. It highlights how this shift may prompt a broader loss of faith in knowledge work itself, raising questions about the future role and well-being of professionals in an AI-driven economy.

https://www.noemamag.com/why-is-everyone-in-tech-so-sad/

When People Think AI Did the Creative Work, Task Meaning and Effort Decline

, , ,

A study by researchers from the United States and the Netherlands found that when people believe AI created a creative output, they perceive the related task as less meaningful and are less willing to put in effort, such as contributing their own ideas. This decline in task meaning and motivation occurs despite the quality of the AI-generated work remaining constant, highlighting a challenge for organizations adopting AI: preserving human engagement and a sense of ownership in AI-assisted workflows to fully realize productivity gains.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/when-people-think-ai-did-the-creative-work-task-meaning-and-effort-decline/

AI at Work: Gains at the Top, Pressure for Everyone Else

, , ,

A recent survey by Groundwork Collaborative and Ipsos reveals that most American workers anticipate AI will primarily benefit business owners and executives rather than employees, with many expecting AI to worsen job conditions by eliminating roles and increasing work pressure. AI use is significantly higher among college graduates and white-collar workers, who also express more optimism about AI improving their jobs, while lower-income, less-educated, and Black workers are more likely to fear job replacement and negative impacts. Unemployed individuals report even greater concern about AI’s adverse effects on their employment prospects.

https://groundworkcollaborative.org/work/ai-at-work-gains-at-the-top-pressure-for-everyone-else/

Could AI Take Your Job? Some Workers in China Already Know the Answer

, , ,

In China, the rapid deployment of AI technologies, such as driverless taxis, is intensifying concerns about job security amid a fragile labor market where millions have shifted into gig work. While AI aims to drive shared prosperity, gig and white-collar workers express fear and uncertainty as automation disrupts traditional employment and wages. The country faces rising unemployment alongside a surge in flexible employment, highlighting tensions between technological progress and workforce stability.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/31/china-ai-jobs-workers-labour-market-technology

What Is Really Happening to Jobs? Separating AI Hype From Reality

, ,

Current research indicates that AI’s overall impact on employment remains small, with no significant job losses directly attributable to AI so far, although recent graduates in AI-exposed jobs face a tougher labor market potentially linked to AI adoption. AI generally enhances worker productivity, especially for less experienced workers, but gains vary widely by task and skill level, and firm adoption of AI is accelerating unevenly—mostly concentrated in technology and information-intensive sectors—with broad structural effects and significant workforce shifts still unfolding.

https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/policy-brief/what-really-happening-jobs-separating-ai-hype-reality

Exclusive: Workers Are Crossing Job Boundaries with AI, OpenAI Research Shows

, ,

OpenAI research reveals that workers increasingly use ChatGPT to perform tasks associated with other occupations, with about 44% of occupation-specific AI requests crossing traditional job boundaries. This trend is particularly notable among customer service, design, and HR professionals and is more pronounced in smaller firms, suggesting AI may be enabling employees to fill expertise gaps and potentially reshape job design and hiring practices before these changes appear in labor statistics. However, the study does not establish if AI is creating new cross-occupational tasks or improving productivity and work quality.

https://www.axios.com/2026/07/27/openai-chatgpt-work-specialists

AI Is Redesigning Work: Adecco Group Whitepaper Reveals the Need for Hybrid Workforce Orchestration

, ,

The Adecco Group’s new whitepaper highlights that AI is reshaping work by transforming tasks, workflows, and skill requirements faster than it eliminates jobs, with uneven impacts across sectors and roles. It emphasizes the emerging discipline of hybrid workforce orchestration—integrating people, AI agents, and physical AI—to maximize value and productivity, noting that firms redesigning workflows around hybrid human-AI systems achieve greater gains than those treating AI as a standalone tool. The report calls for organizations to build new capabilities in workforce analytics, work redesign, AI management, reskilling, and governance to capture sustainable value from AI-driven workforce transformation.

https://www.adeccogroup.com/our-group/media/press-releases/rise-of-hybrid-labor-markets

Will Your Job Be Replaced by AI? Here Are the Roles Most Affected

,

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are rapidly increasing automation and augmentation of work, especially in roles involving software development, finance, and creative industries. Research shows significant job displacement effects among younger workers in AI-exposed sectors, with companies investing heavily in AI to boost productivity but also facing high operational costs that may limit automation uptake. While AI adoption is reshaping labor demand, uncertainties remain about the pace and extent of job replacement across different sectors and regions.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn7nllr4vd6o

What Will Be Left for Us to Work On?

,

Arvind Narayanan discusses the evolving role of human work amid increasing automation and AI advances, questioning what tasks will remain uniquely human. He argues that while many routine and even some complex tasks are becoming automated, humans will continue to be needed for roles involving creativity, empathy, ethical judgment, and complex social interactions. This shift calls for adapting workforce skills and organizational approaches to focus on areas where human qualities and oversight remain essential.

https://www.normaltech.ai/p/what-will-be-left-for-us-to-work

Robot Laws Now

,

Robots are rapidly advancing from simple machines to sophisticated AI-enabled humanoids used in industries like construction, logistics, airports, and public transport across countries such as Japan, Singapore, and China. The Philippines, however, lacks dedicated legislation to govern the deployment, safety, cybersecurity, and labor impacts of robots, creating urgency for a legal framework that includes risk classification, firmware transparency, workforce transition plans, and adoption of international safety standards. As robots move from novelty to critical infrastructure, establishing clear regulations is essential to manage technological integration and protect public safety and labor interests.

https://bworldonline.com/opinion/2026/07/16/763693/robot-laws-now/

AI Job Grief: The Unnamed Psychological Crisis Hitting Tech Workers

, , ,

AI-driven job displacement is causing a unique form of psychological grief among tech workers that extends beyond typical fear or anxiety, as it threatens their professional identity and sense of self. This grief is often disenfranchised, lacking social acknowledgment or institutional support, which complicates emotional processing and recovery, especially as AI continues to evolve rapidly, leaving no stable endpoint for acceptance. The resulting emotional distress manifests in symptoms like anxiety and depression and affects workforce behavior, including sabotage of AI implementations, while existing models of grief and institutional responses fail to adequately address this ongoing crisis.

https://jackmaguire.org/blog/ai-job-grief/

Scroll to Top